The head forgery 6 lakh 96 thousand rupees of development works, reached the police complain about the head

The people who vote on their behalf by believing in the public, and when the money for the development work that comes to the public for themselves, then what will they say?

Rajiv Chawla / Lokjan Today / Kichha, Udhamsinghnagar

kichha || In the Kichha tehsil area, the accused of village Najimabad is accused of extorting 6 lakh 96 thousand rupees from a fake sign. In the matter, Gram Panchayat Development Officer has given a prayer letter in Kuchwali Kothwali and has taken an action plan.

Surjit Singh, the head of village Najimabad of Vishal Vidhansabha area of ​​BO- Udham Singh Nagar is facing serious charges. The village headman has been accused of fraudulently clearing the hands of 6 lakh 96 thousand rupees in a fake signature. The incident was exposed when the village panchayat development officer Sumit Kumar Verma removed the statement of the account and the land under his feet slipped. The amount of 6 lakh 96 thousand rupees was withdrawn from the account. After that, during the investigation, it was discovered that the amount of 6 lakh 96 thousand rupees was taken by the village head, in the 8th Chakra, by signing the fake signature of the village development officer on June 7, 2019. The operation of the Bank of the village of village Dasal Gram is operated by the signing of the village head and village development officer. After which, in the case, the village development officer handed over the affidavit to the police in the case of fraudulent signing of misappropriation and misuse of government money against village head Surjit Singh of Najimabad. It is noteworthy that even earlier, village chief Surjit Singh has been accused of corruption, in which the charges of scam related to the construction of toilets by Prime Minister Surjit Singh and his nephew have been dropped. The inquiry was done by the District Magistrate himself and after the conviction, the people of the village had to pay the money for the construction of toilets. If the administration had taken strict action, then the prince did not have the courage to make a fraud again. Now, to see what the administration once again / how much action is done, the principal has falsified himself by making a fake sign of the administrative officer. The same quote Kotwal Umesh Malik said that the questionnaire has been given in the case of the fake encounter. After which the proceeding will be done.